7:30am – 9am / ZOOM
Attendance
Voting Members: Heather Harrell (Chair), Anita Rajasekhar, Daniel Lewis, Jason Fromm, Jennifer Fieber, Melanie Hagen, Olivier Barolette, Reetu Grewal, Robert Seifert, Velyn Wu.
Ex-Officio: Ashleigh Wright, Carrie Adams, Chris Giordano, Diane Howell, Elisa Sottile, Elizabeth DeVos, Hannah Norton, Jennifer Hamilton, Kathy Green, Lynne Meyer, Marquia Walker, Maureen Novak, Melissa Turley, Meredith Thompson, Phuong Huynh, Shelley Collins. Guests: Maryam Sattari, MD, Brad Bruggeman, MD, Paulette Hahn, MD.
Recording: Sandi Reveille
Dr. Harrell called the meeting to order at 7:34am.
1. A motion was made to approve the consent agenda, seconded, and approved.
- Vote required
- USMLE Policy
Provide clarity on the remediation process for the CSE Exams. The change was based on the wording which was a little confusing. The process is that the students are able to take Step 1 as long as they had remediated all of their coursework which is applicable to Step 1 and that the CSE exam did not have any bearing on this.
- USMLE Policy
Motion to approve this change. Motion was seconded and approved.
-
- Discovery Pathway Requirements
Approve the proposed criteria for Discovery Pathways:
- Discovery Pathway Requirements
Proposed Criteria for DPs
- Relevant: Content must align with current and future healthcare needs
- General: Areas must cross a variety of specialties (students are undifferentiated at this stage)
- Feasible: Faculty and infrastructure are available, and resources require minimal funds
- Realistic: Activities use assigned time and requirements don’t overload students
- Outcome-Oriented: Clear learning objectives and assessment methods with clear standards for distinction within the pathway that align in terms of rigor across all DPs
- Available: Must be open to any student in medical school, irrespective of background (e.g. regardless of research experience, MD or MD-PhD, career interest)
Proposed Limit to DPs
No more than 10 DPs will be offered at any one time.
DPs should have at least 5 students enrolled each year to be supported
Motion to approve limiting to 10 pathways with a minimum of 5 students per each year and approve criteria for discovery pathways to be considered a pathway.
Motion was seconded and approved.
-
- Research and Discovery Course
Presented proposed new learning objectives for the Research and Discovery course.
- Research and Discovery Course
Proposed New Learning Objectives for Research and Discovery
- Explain the key components of the research process from hypothesis generation to publication
- Distinguish among the broad types of research and scholarship
- Discuss the role of intellectual curiosity in advancing medical knowledge
- Describe types of research communication
- Identify best practices for creating effective presentations of research findings
Motion to approve the addition of these objectives.
Motion was seconded and approved.
-
- Genetics and Health Learning Objectives
Updates to the Genetics and Health Learning Objectives. Discussed whether some LO’s should be their own LO or should be a sub-objective within the LO.
- Genetics and Health Learning Objectives
Motion to approve the new learning objectives.
Motion was seconded and approved.
-
- Clerkship Grade Distribution
Voted at last meeting to remove minus grades, discussed effect on distribution. Clerkship directors were split between the following two proposals.
- Clerkship Grade Distribution
Proposal 1: A’s 30 – 35%; B+’s 45 – 50%; B’s 15 – 25%
Proposal 2: A’s 25 – 30%; B+’s 40 – 45%; B’s 25 – 30%
Committee members decided that there did not need to be a suggested distribution coming from the committee. Rather, asked clerkship directors to develop more consistency around the definition of what excellence is. Specifically, asked them to define what an A performance looks like.
-
- Curriculum Committee minutes – 04.09.2024
Change the verbiage of the Administrative Structure policies to reflect correct titles.
- Curriculum Committee minutes – 04.09.2024
Motion to approve change.
Motion was seconded and approved.
-
- Professionalism Assessment in Clinical Years
Provided an update of the programmatic assessment of professionalism and about how to operationalize this in the upcoming academic year (which will be a shadow year). Presented information on existing clinical evaluation tool and P-Mex.
- Professionalism Assessment in Clinical Years
Motion to approve moving from the 3 and 4 point scale to the 9 point.
Motion was seconded and approved.
-
- Graduation Requirements
For students who do not match in a residency program, this allows the student to drop one required educational experience to participate in research or away rotations which will allow them to defer their graduation.
- Graduation Requirements
Motion to approve this change.
Motion was seconded and approved.
-
- Approve removal of minus grades from all affected policies and other information
Due to removal of minus grades, all affected policies and other information needs to be updated.
- Approve removal of minus grades from all affected policies and other information
Motion to remove the words “minus grades” from all affected policies and official documents.
Motion was seconded and approved.
-
- Travel funding
Motion to change funding availability and notification from academic year to fiscal year.
- Travel funding
Motion to approve academic to fiscal.
Motion was seconded and approved.
-
- CPESA Report
Provided the update of the Class of 2027 Performance report. - SADEA/LCME Update
Survey sent out regarding Strategic Planning. Would appreciate everyone taking the time to complete. - Good News (will present at next meeting)
Provide good news events for College of Medicine faculty, residents, students
- CPESA Report